Interview: Laurie Childers


Laurie Childers is an artist, ceramics instructor, and singer/songwriter in Corvallis, Oregon. In the 1980s, she worked around the world with artisans building fuel-efficient cookstoves and learned much about the effect of foreign and domestic economic policies upon the lives of real people as well as the land.    Continue reading “Interview: Laurie Childers”

Don’t Tread on White Supremacy

 

By Alexander N. Riccio

The progress U.S. culture has made through concerted social and economic movements amounts to little in the face of our white supremacist status quo. This is not to claim there have not been improvements, or that such improvements haven’t yielded dramatic results, but we should not be comfortable Continue reading “Don’t Tread on White Supremacy”

Interview: Tom Motko

Tom Motko joined the U.S. Army in 1968 within a month of graduating from high school, was trained as a Vietnamese linguist/ voice intercept operator at the Defense Language Institute in Monterey, CA and Goodfellow ABF, TX, and worked in a command subordinate to the National Security Agency. His duty stations included Japan, Taiwan, and Viet Nam. Continue reading “Interview: Tom Motko”

Minding P’s and Q’s

by Tony Vogt

The cap in Capitalism

worn backwards

might stop the whole show.

 

The hag in Hagiography

simmers stew

from the bones of saints.

Says, “We’re either all

going to heaven or

we ain’t.”

(click the title to read more!)
Continue reading “Minding P’s and Q’s”

When is an ally poised to become a deserter?

By Alex Sabrina Morgan

When is an ally poised to become a deserter?

When an interest in politics or equality extends as far as their genitals or their brand positioning, and stops short of the zone of personal risk or uncertainty.

Continue reading “When is an ally poised to become a deserter?”

On the Relevance of Orwell’s ‘1984’

By Joseph Orosco

In the Spring term of 2014, I offered a course titled, “Nineteen Eighty Four and Social Justice.”  This timing put the class at three decades after the year 1984; the class itself took place during the months of April, May, and June — approximately the season of the events of the novel.

(Click the title to read more)

Continue reading “On the Relevance of Orwell’s ‘1984’”

What’s the Appeal of Marriage Equality?

By Christian Matheis
By the middle of 2014, legislative, judicial, and electoral actions in 19 U.S. American states have paved the way for nationalized access to marriage for adult couples without restriction to sex or gender. The movement for “gay marriage” or, more inclusively, “marriage equality” has gained broad support in social, political, and economic facets of contemporary U.S. society. Progressive organizations herald the shift as a triumph against cultural homophobia and institutionalized discrimination. Celebrities and politicians clamor to give endorsements for marriage equality, and corporate sponsors flock to hang their banners on what seems the leading civil rights issue of the day. Even certain conservative groups have come to endorse the expansion of marriage, parting ways with their peers over the issue. It seems a sea-change waits just around the corner and everything from domestic, familial intimacy to government tax codes will shift in its tidal wake. Continue reading “What’s the Appeal of Marriage Equality?”

Soldiers No MORE in the War Against Women: A Call to Men

A Call to Men to Help End the Nightmare of Misogyny
by Chris Crass / (First published in EarthFirst! Newswire)

There is a war against women, and men and boys are trained everyday to be the soldiers. Misogynist violence isn’t the biological imperative of men. Misogyny, the worldview that engenders, validates, and normalizes violence against women, is beaten into boys and woven into the fabric of “successful masculinity”.

While very few men consciously choose to be horrible to women, the reality is, everyday “respectable” and “acceptable” norms of how men interact and treat women are infused with male entitlement and male privilege. Together, these norms, contribute to a culture of misogyny, rape, assault, and emotional abuse. A hallmark of this culture is the tragic indifference of men to women’s lives, leadership, dreams, needs, wants, and futures. Everyday sexist norms include constant interruptions of women speaking, catcalls on the street, regular comments about women’s appearance rather then their contributions and character, communicating in subtle and blatant ways that men see women as there to serve men’s needs, zoning out when women speak so as to formulate your own thoughts or to sexualize them, ignoring women’s ideas and then repeating them back later as your own ideas, and taking up emotional, verbal, energetic and physical space in ways that silence and push women out.

And when women complain about any aspect of the enormity of patriarchal culture or daily threats and realities of violence, such as the recent explicitly misogynistic and racist mass murderer in Santa Barbara, men overwhelming respond in a chorus of “but not all men act that way”, rather then expressing a profound sadness for the reality of patriarchal culture and violence, followed by a commitment to learn more and take action to change it. Fear of being implicated, in any way, is greater for far too many men, then fear of what the reality of patriarchal culture and violence means for women in their lives. But just like soldiers, men aren’t born this way, they are trained.

crass

In workshops on “Men and Feminism” with thousands of men around the U.S. and Canada, I often use an exercise developed by Paul Kivel and the Oakland Men’s Project. I ask men, “Who here has been told ‘act like a man?’” Almost all the hands go up. What does that mean I ask? Typical responses include: “don’t cry,” “always be in control,” “suck it up and be tough,” and “don’t be emotional.” When I ask what emotions men are allowed to express, I hear: “anger,” “jealousy,” and “resentment.” I then ask what the men are called when they step out of the “act like a man box,” and a long list of slurs intended to degrade men and boys as either gay or feminized is given.

This training to “act like a man” is intended to turn boys into soldiers – soldiers deeply detached from their emotions, except violent rage and anger, and to internalize misogyny and homophobia as a basis for their masculinity. I then ask men to raise their hands if they were ever beaten up by male family members or by boys in school for “not acting like a man.” At least half of the hands go up. “How many of you have ever experienced depression, anxiety, or low self-esteem?” I inquire; almost all the hands go up. Nearly every hand is raised when I ask, “How many of you have been afraid to tell anyone?” The exercise ends with a few additional questions. How many of you have used drugs or alcohol to escape? How many of you have used violent or dangerous behavior to escape? How many of you have contemplated suicide? I raise my hand for many of these, including the last one.

This is the nightmare of patriarchy in the lives of men, and it is a nightmare we perpetuate in subtle and profound ways. This is the training of soldiers in the war against women, and it is pervasive. But this is not how it has always been. Throughout the world, throughout history, there have been societies and cultures that were far more egalitarian, without the strict gender roles, where misogynistic violence wasn’t the norm. To understand why boys are trained to be soldiers, we must look at the other wars they have been trained to be part of.

Misogyny has been and is a weapon of colonization against Indigenous peoples and nations – not only attacking the power of women in Indigenous societies, but forcing patriarchy into those societies to divide and conquer them. Gender violence was central to the development and organization of the Atlantic slave trade and the system of plantation slavery on the South – using rape to both populate the slave system as the child of a slave is born into slavery, but also again, to dehumanize enslaved women to and further suppress the power of women and fracture the overall community. Misogyny was and continues to be central to the development and expansion of capitalist economic relationship. Across the globe, communities were uprooted from the land, and gendered divisions of labor hardened: men forced into paid labor to make someone else rich, women into unpaid, unvalued reproductive labor at the same time as men were granted social permission to unleash the rage and misery of their own exploitation and disempowerment on their wives and children.

Learning this history is key to men to help ending the war against women. From Andrea Smith’s analysis of sexual violence as a tool of genocide, to Maria Mies and Silvia Federici’s writing on violence against women as a tool to divide European peasant and working class communities to construct capitalism, to Angela Davis’s formulation that women in enslaved African communities and in all oppressed communities have been at the forefront of resistance and liberation struggles and therefore, “the slave master’s sexual domination of the black woman contained an unveiled element of counterinsurgency”.

Today, the war on women is the massive number of women who are raped and assaulted. It is the fact that domestic violence support services get more then 75,000 requests for assistance on a typical day; that domestic violence is the leading cause of injury for women between the ages of 15 and 44, and the leading cause of death for Black women of the same ages. It is the crisis of over 1200 missing or murdered Indigenous girls and women in Canada over the past 30 years. It is the disproportionate amount of violence transgender women face from street harassment to police violence. It is African-American mother Marissa Alexander currently serving 20 years in a Florida prison for firing a warning shot, in which no one was hurt, to scare away her abusive husband while George Zimmerman was found justified in killing unarmed Black teenager Trayvon Martin based on the same legal argument.

The war on women is the U.S. government’s forced sterilization of Indigenous, Black and Latina women over hundreds of years, with it continuing to happen to incarcerated women. It is the austerity measures of the U.S government gutting publicly funded institutions such as schools, welfare, food stamp programs, and early childhood learning programs, while redistributing money, via tax policy, from working class, poor, and middle class communities to the richest people on the planet. Austerity measures further put the burden of unpaid labor of maintaining life and society on the backs of women, particularly women of color. Along with colonization and hundreds of years of the Atlantic slave trade, the unpaid reproductive labor of women, is the foundation of capitalism. The war against women is the gender-based violence of husbands, boyfriends and the state to maintain the structures of unpaid women’s reproductive labor.

While men, in general, reap a wide range of male privileges (with access to those privileges differentiated unequally by race, class, sexuality, ability, citizenship, and nationality), it’s time for men in the millions to declare that we will no longer be the soldiers in the war against women. That we will no longer perpetuate sexist attitudes, cultural practices and public policies that undermine women’s leadership, dignity, and power in society. That we will work against the long term impacts of white supremacy, colonization, homophobia, and economic exploitation in society and all of our communities.

Throughout history and today, women have resisted. As men, we must learn from and join with feminist movements to redefine what it means to act like a man, so that we can act like many kinds of men – or other genders entirely. Some of us can build on our ancestors’ traditions of different kinds of masculinities. In many cases we already have models of masculinity upon which we can draw and find inspiration. But we must collectively, along with women and people of other genders, redefine masculinities in ways that replace misogyny and homophobia with love and compassion. We must collectively redefine masculinities in ways that center visions and values of economic, racial, gender, disability and environmental justice. As men, let us work to heal from the training we’ve received to be soldiers in the war against women, let us look to feminist women’s leadership for vision and guidance of the society we want to live in, and let us join with people of all genders to end the violence and exploitation of all of these wars. Beyond the nightmare of patriarchy is a world of possibility. Let us be courageous, and go there together.

For Further Reading:

• Feminism is for Everybody: Passionate Politics by bell hooks

• Men’s Work: How to Stop Violence That Tears Our Lives Apart by Paul Kivel

• The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity and Love by bell hooks

• Boys Will Be Men: Raising Our Sons for Courage, Caring and Community by Paul Kivel

• Conquest: Sexual Violence and the American Indian Genocide by Andrea Smith

• Women, Race and Class by Angela Davis

• Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale by Maria Mies

• Caliban and the Witch by Silvia Federici

Note: thank you to Andy Cornell, Lydia Pelot-Hobbs, Jardana Peacock, and Chanelle Gallant for feedback.

Chris Crass is the father of a beautiful little boy named River, and is a longtime social justice organizer who writes and speaks widely about anti-racist organizing, feminism for men, lessons and strategies to build visionary movements, and leadership for liberation. He is the author of Towards Collective Liberation: Anti-racist Organizing, Feminist Praxis, and Movement Building Strategy, published by PM Press. He is a Unitarian Universalist and lives in Nashville, Tennessee. His website is www.chriscrass.org.

 

Beyond Donald Sterling

Lazy Analysis Leads to Lazy Cynicism

By Alexander N. Riccio 

Perhaps the Left has become so beleaguered by power structures that any and every effort toward equality or justice is simply discarded as ‘not revolutionary enough.’ The current ubiquitous media fodder surrounding Donald Sterling, racist owner of the L.A. Clippers, has resulted in the obligatory commentary of Leftist publications including Z Magazine (a personal favorite of mine). The conclusions drawn over the controversy, as captured by Z contributor Ajamu Baraka, focus on the blatant “hypocrisy of race discourse in the U.S.” and “the dissociation between this outrage against black people and the ongoing assault in the world of sports on the indigenous people.” Baraka muses on the inability of the American public to concern themselves with serious matters of white supremacy, such as NATO attacks on Libya and drone strikes on Middle-Eastern civilians, while almost instinctively rising to express outrage over “silly, racist comments.”

While it is valid to expose the pretense of “polite white society” and equally reasonable to mention the tremendous obstacles facing racial equality in the sports world (e.g. the defiance of the Washington Redskins organization to change the team name) and U.S. at large, it is also terrifically absurd to imagine that the reaction to Sterling’s “silly, racist comments” would result in the radical restructuring of the National Basketball Association (NBA) and subsequent abolition of white supremacy.   The Left is so starved for a revolution that it’s clouding its analysis. Baraka displays a lack of insight when he attempts to inject revolutionary importance into the slim opening presented by the Sterling controversy. Of course the Left needs to advance real conversations about race.

Obviously white supremacy is an ideology that must be undermined. And clearly there are flagrant manifestations of hypocrisy within media coverage over Sterling. So what can we take away from the Sterling controversy?

donald-sterling-the-shop-blog

Remarkably, the role of the National Basketball Players Association (NBPA)—to my knowledge—has largely gone unnoticed in both mainstream and alternative outlets. At the mere hint of a NBPA boycott of the current NBA playoffs, and a fairly modest display of player solidarity, NBA Commissioner Adam Silver immediately responded to the will of the players union by banning Sterling from the NBA for life. Silver has also maintained that he will do everything in his power to force Sterling to sell his team.

Any lesson to be learned from the Sterling controversy should revolve around the importance of organizing. The sole reason Commissioner Silver acted against Sterling was due to an organized players union; without the union’s demand to expel Sterling from basketball, no form of reprisal would have been levied against Sterling, except perhaps a proverbial slap-on-the-wrist.

When Sterling’s comments were exposed, an inch of possibility opened up for social justice, and that inch was taken. Now we have an opportunity to use this piece of current history as an advantage, as an instance when actions of solidarity and an organized workforce came together and acquired the change they demanded. We must be careful not to expect an institution built by white supremacy to crumble due to a crack in its structure, for these impracticalities lead to the type of lazy analysis, and, thus, lazy cynicism so pervasive amongst the Left.

Books for feminist men

Chris Crass has a new essay in response to the recent Isla Vista massacre.  In it, he discusses the ways in which men need to begin to confront the cultural violence of misogyny the nurtures the world views of young men such as Elliot Rodgers.  Chris calls on men to engage with feminist theory, in particular:

“As men, we must learn from, and join with, feminist movements to redefine what it means to act like a man, so that we can act like many kinds of men, and/or other genders entirely. Some of us can build on our ancestors’ traditions of different kinds of masculinities, and in many cases, we already have models of masculinity around us that we draw inspiration from. But we must collectively, along with women and people of other genders, redefine masculinities in ways that actively replace misogyny and homophobia with love and compassion. We must collectively redefine masculinities in ways that center visions and values of economic, racial, gender, disability and environmental justice. As men, let us work to heal from the training we’ve received to be soldiers in the war against women, and let us join with people of all genders to end all of these wars. Beyond the nightmare of patriarchy is a world of possibilities: Let us be courageous, and go there together.”

At the end of the piece he offers a list of books to help begin this process of study and self-reflection:

• Feminism is for Everybody: Passionate Politics by bell hooks

• Men’s Work: How to Stop Violence That Tears Our Lives Apart

• Conquest: Sexual Violence and the American Indian Genocide by Andrea Smith

• Women, Race and Class by Angela Davis

• Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale by Maria Mies

• Caliban and the Witch by Silvia Federici

• The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity and Love by bell hooks

• Boys Will Be Men: Raising Our Sons for Courage, Caring and Community by Paul Kivel

 

Have any of these books been influential in your understanding of sexism, patriarchy, and/or cultural violence?